![]() Skin irritation and pigmentation changes are the most common side effects. Laser Hair Removal is considered to be an exceedingly safe, non-invasive cosmetic procedure. The laser may cause temporary side effects immediately after the procedure. Objective: From an evidence-based view to summarize efficacy and adverse effects from hair removal with ruby, alexandrite, diode, and Nd:YAG lasers and intense pulsed light (IPL). According to the American Academy of Dermatology Association the most common side effects of laser treatment are: 1. You should discuss risks, long-term benefits, and assess expectations. Background: Unwanted hair growth remains a therapeutic challenge and there is a considerable need for an effective and safe treatment modality. Temporary discomfort, redness and swelling are possible after laser hair removal. The most common side effects of laser hair removal include: Skin irritation. We recommend that patients are pre-operatively informed of the expected treatment outcome. Your doctor will mostly likely review your medical history, including medication use, history of skin disorders or scarring, and past hair removal procedures. Risks of side effects vary with skin type, hair color, treatment plan and adherence to pre-treatment and post-treatment care. With laser hair removal, people who have sensitive skin and are only targeting smaller areas (like the underarms) might receive a numbing gel beforehand, but pain-wise, that might not offset. The evidence from controlled clinical trials favours the use of lasers and light sources for removal of unwanted hair. ![]() Based on the present best available evidence we conclude that (i) epilation with lasers and light sources induces a partial short-term hair reduction up to 6 months postoperatively, (ii) efficacy is improved when repeated treatments are given, (iii) efficacy is superior to conventional treatments (shaving, wax epilation, electrolysis), (iv) evidence exists for a partial long-term hair removal efficacy beyond 6 months postoperatively after repetitive treatments with alexandrite and diode lasers and probably after treatment with ruby and Nd:YAG lasers, whereas evidence is lacking for long-term hair removal after IPL treatment, (v) today there is no evidence for a complete and persistent hair removal efficacy, (vi) the occurrence of postoperative side-effects is reported low for all the laser systems. The best available evidence was found for the alexandrite (three RCTs, eight CTs) and diode (three RCTs, four CTs) lasers, followed by the ruby (two RCTs, six CTs) and Nd:YAG (two RCTs, four CTs) lasers, whereas limited evidence was available for IPL sources (one RCT, one CT). Original publications of controlled clinical trials were identified in Medline and the Cochrane Library.Ī total of 9 randomized controlled (RCTs) and 21 controlled trials (CTs) were identified. Unwanted hair growth remains a therapeutic challenge and there is a considerable need for an effective and safe treatment modality.įrom an evidence-based view to summarize efficacy and adverse effects from hair removal with ruby, alexandrite, diode, and Nd:YAG lasers and intense pulsed light (IPL).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |